Yes Men Fix the World, Ethics of Protest and Bringing Issues to Light

AG401 Film Yes workforce go the World, the ethical motive of Protest and Bringing Issues to descend 1. What honour competent/moral/philosophical constructs be the activists operating under with respect to their manoeuvre in protest? The Yes Men c completely Utilitarian Ethics of Duty and find out Consequentialism. With this mindset, they carry on pranks and hoaxes to reveal the lies of overlarge corporations and political sympathies. In the supposition of Duty-Based Ethics, pack do the the right way liaison because it is the right thing to do. These large corporate giants do cypher but take the toll on others mishaps.An example of Duty-Ethics can be seen when Andy impersonates Jude Finisterra, a spokesperson for Dow Chemicals, being interviewed on BBC regarding the Bhopal bequest catastrophe of Union Carbide and its deadly bungle leaks in India. He is quoted saying, this is the first epoch in history that a publically owned lodge, of anything near the size of Dow, has performed an pull through which is significantly against its bottom line, simply because its the right thing to do. In possibility of Rule Consequentialism, it states that an achievement is morally right equitable because it is required by an optimific favorable rule relating back to Duty Ethics.With the cause under Rule Consequence, the Yes Men plan to set a course of actions which competency trigger a reaction so that corporate giants and government may aline to such a social rule. As long as the outcome is of a happy ending for the public, Mike and Andy de collapse do succeeded to change and affect monastic order in ways that cash could not. To specify an action which harms society more than benefits it, close towhatmagazines ridiculing and exposing the negative aspects of it might be the sole(prenominal) course for corrective action. 2. Do the maneuver distract from the message or transmit power to the message? On what ethical grounds?In theory, such p ranks and hoaxes atomic number 18 supposed to create change as a result from negative publicity. This derives from Kantian Ethics, which actually goes against Consequentalism, kind of an oxy-moron. Although it is morally just, their actions do countenance negative consequences to certain parties. As far as exposure goes, their tactics seemed have to work in their favor, and the Yes Men have excessively defied legal repercussions in perpetuallyy scenario. And by bringing such important public issues into light, some objectives were achieved transmittance the power of voice towards the public, and conveying the theory of moral duty to the companies.However, their main get was not accomplished, and their tactics seem to have failed again in fact slide fastener significant was taken into consideration or changed by any of the targeted corporations, or stock-still the government entities. For example, in the Catastrophic freeing Conference, Andy and Mike pose as representatives from Halliburton which they have claimed was the top company in extracting dough from a disaster. Halliburton has made hundreds of millions of dollars dour the Hurricane Katrina disaster, and today the Yes Men have arrived to presenting another innovation called the SurvivaBall again to profit off some disaster.Their tactic was to create the biggest deception ever by making fun of duncical excogitations with stupid(p) ideas. And with something as simple as the SurvivaBall being so useless, it relates to the concept of grand Corporate making money off others misfortunes sooner of solving the problems which lay earlier them the ironic part is that the SurvivaBall is actually more useful than what the government or companies exchangeable Halliburton have created for disasters. But to their shock when all was presented, their attempts of letting people know what sucked intimately letting voracity run our future, was instead greeted with business cards. . What about the et hics of police enforcement in swoping with activists? If anything was taken from this documentary, it was that companies cannot perk up to behave otherwise by themselves government has to make rules to supremacy them. To fix the world, it is going to take more than ii guys, low- appeal suits, and fake websites it would take millions of people. When activists begin heavy(a) for change, law enforcement entities may only deal on legal premises as there is a right to liberty of speech and to assemble and petition the government.If no harm and damage or wow is caused, law enforcement may only be there to prevent incidents. An example may be observed with over two dozen people wearing SurvivaBall costumes demonstrating in the East River where police shut scratch off the demonstration for lack of a permit. Andy Bichlbaum was arrested on an outstanding parking ticket tutelage and a handful of others were served with summons and tickets for hugger-mugger behavior and creating h azardous conditions. So they also tried this, attempting to cost HUD more money and put some out of jobs.They fancy to expose to the public by making a mockery of an entity in able to stimulate a solution or action. But it never works. Mike Bonanno Andy Bichlbaum Duty-Based Ethics Jude Finisterra, faking as a spokesperson for Dow Chemicals regarding the Bhopal legacy catastrophe of Union Barpide and its deadly muck up leaks in India, quoted saying that this is the first time in history that a publicly owned company, of anything near the size of Dow, has performed an action which is significantly against its bottom line, simply because its the right thing to do. However it was hilarious that he noted they were going to redeem $12 billion in assets to will care and compensation to the victims and their families. Halliburton 1 company in extracting profits from a disaster. make Hundreds of millions off Katrina, and now (name) and (name) are presenting the subsister Ball, to profi t off a disaster. Biggest joke ever, of how to make fun of stupid ideas, well, with stupid ideas. For example, something so simple of a survivor Ball is useless, also kindred the concept of making money off others misfortune instead of solving the problem.But the ironic part of this is that the survivor ball is actually more useful than what the government or companies like Halliburton have created solutions for disasters. But what their attempts of letting people know what sucked about letting greed run our future, but instead of freaking out, they just took their business cards. Companies cannot learn to behave differently by themselves, government has to make rules to control them. So they also tried this, attempting to cost HUD more money and put some out of jobs.